Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit garyray-501488's column >>

GARYRAY-501488

EVERY PAYING JOB DEPENDS ON SOMEONE OR SOMETHING SPENDING, THEREFORE: SPENDING CUTS = JOB CUTS
Articles Posted: 30  Links Seeded: 575
Member Since: 9/2008  Last Seen: 5/21/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Do You Support The Arizona Illegal Immigration Law? (Poll)

Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:34 AM EDT
politics, news, obama, economy, republicans, democrats, conservatives
By garyray-501488

Live Poll

Do You Support The Arizona Illegal Immigration Law?

View Results
  • 94603
    Yes
    84%
  • 94604
    No
    16%
  • 94605
    Don't Know
    0%

VoteTotal Votes: 1415

Advertise | AdChoices

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer (R) signed a bill on ILLEGAL immigration, into law on Friday April 23, 2010.

The Arizona Law requires immigrants to carry their alien registration documents and requires the police to question people if they have a reason to SUSPECT they’re in the United States illegally. The bill will also address those who knowingly hire illegal immigrants or transport them.

Post your comments concerning the new Arizona law.

Link to full text of bill:

HERE

Illegal Immigration & Racial Profiling (POLL)
Link Here

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • garyray-501488's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: 2010 Elections, Activism, Brave New World, Centervine, Democrats, Gut Check America, Mad For Rachel Maddow, Michael Moore's Army, No Amnesty, ObamaExpress, ObamaVine, Political Analysis, Political Economy , Politics in USA
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (290)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
garyray-501488

What are your thoughts on the Arizona illegal immigration law?

  • 9 votes
#1 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:29 AM EDT
storyartist

illegal immigration law --- does *illegal* modify immigration, or does it modify law?

The only good that might come of this, as someone mentioned, is that it could turn out to be a Terri Schiavo effect -- a rallying point for reform, a reason to unify against measures such as the AZ legislative attempt rather than bickering a la healthcare reform.

  • 15 votes
#1.1 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:51 AM EDT
R. Donald SnyderExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

This law will be tossed out no matter what it's supporter think. It oversteps the legal authority of the states and it's obviously racist and an affront to the civil rights of legal Hispanic Americans. If it weren't so sick, it'd be seen as a joke and I'm sure the rest of the civilized world is laughing at the embarrassment Arizona has brought down on our nation.

I defy any supporter of this law to tell me how an officer in Arizona can form a reasonable suspicion that a person might be in the country illegally without taking the color of their skin into account. The fact is that it can not be done. The only way to enforce this law is by racial profiling and that's racism at it worst. Racial profiling is illegal in this country and should always remain so.

As for asking a person's status during a contact of a different type, well that doesn't even meet the laugh test. No reasonable federal court in America will consider a completely unrelated reason to contact a person as just cause to inquire about that persons status as a citizen. There is no basis for the officer to ask about it and no honest judge will allow it to stand. This is not just a racist law, it's simply a bad law on several different levels. It hasn't got a chance of standing up to any challenge and will be thrown out.

  • 28 votes
#1.2 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:55 AM EDT
Azerith

I support this law 100%

The law says that if you get caught breaking the law and do not have ID on you then you can be detained till citizenship is verified

If a person is thought to be an illegal they will be transported to ICE for verification and deportation

  • 24 votes
#1.3 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:34 AM EDT
BKER1492

Arizona passed this law because of the overwhelming amount of crime being conducted by Illegal Hispanics. I suspect this law will do exactly what happend in Virginia and Maryland where one county went after illegals, and the county next door declared itself a safe haven. The safe haven counties are regretting thier decisions as all the trouble makers moved to thier counties. I expect the trouble makers in AZ to move to California and New Mexico and make a mess over there.

  • 24 votes
#1.4 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:53 AM EDT
1623 yankee

There is a real stress test coming up. While on the face of it most Americans may agree with the principles of dealing with illegal immigration, the real problems come with society's perceptions of how it should be dealt with. The very scale of this situation in the United States brings a whole new level of play into action.

This bill may seem noble and necessary in its purpose but great caution and restraint must be placed on its enactment and enforcement. I don't envy Arizona law enforcement officials the two separate fronts that they have just been assigned to monitor (unless of course they become part of the problem).

The potential for increasing racism and vigilante actions is HUGE! Like many government actions at all levels, there are times when unexpected results rear their ugly heads. I am MOST concerned about the possible perceptions by vigilante and racist groups to take this as a sign of defacto approval for illegal immigrant "hunting". Ignorance grabs at any opportunity to bolster its position in the human psyche and always increases when even the slightest opening is offered.

Frankly, this smacks of the n------ hunting mentality that was rampant in the south as recently as 20 years ago. It opens a whole new vista for extreme right supremacists to feel superior and to think that they are immune from civility and due process.

This is NOT a step in the right direction for our country and I genuinely fear for Arizona and the United States.

  • 14 votes
#1.5 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:30 AM EDT
the noyd

I think what needs to be done. Is to shut down the border. Refuse to let a none resident work. Go to the companys who've got none residents working and fine them if they don't hire a resident. Stop handing out free to take our jobs cards. Do not give them anymore free american dollars. They will go back to the country they fleed from. People say they are doing jobs no one wants that's heuy!!!! The rich want the slave labor to get richer. While american workers are loosing their homes and cannot feed their children. You people using them to do your dirty work for pennys are a huge problem. People open your eyes to this problem and make it nation wide.

  • 14 votes
#1.6 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:32 AM EDT
toponer

As a Hispanic American, I profoundly disagree with this legislation, but at the same time, I understand the concerns of Americans. I have to acknowledge that there has been an abuse by illegal immigrants in this country, but I place the blame on the federal government for not enforcing the current laws, and on the employers how keep hiring the undocumented workers.

The U.S. must also hold these governments accountable; who encourage their citizens to flee, instead of providing them with good jobs. They are also to blame in this, because they depend on the monies that their citizens sent back to their countries, so they have no need to crack down on this.

Now, Hispanics are not all united when it comes to illegal immigration, but a law like this, does unite us. We don't want to be racially profiled by police officers. We are already a target, but this makes that target, even wider, and it makes it legal to harass us, just for the way the we look.

The President and Congress must act, because this is a serious problem. We need to crack down on employers who hire undocumented workers, and make it extremely financially painful for those who continue to head down this path.

This also hurts Hispanic Americans, who have to compete with workers who look like them, and will not only work for less money, but who won't complaint when they are been treated unfairly. How can Hispanic Americans, or any American compete with that?

This law is not the answer, but hopefully the government will finally fix this problem.

  • 17 votes
#1.7 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:13 AM EDT
Brandon-801865

Why target the "illegals?"

Shouldn't the State be going after the businesses that hire them?

If there is no work, "illegals" won't stick around.

That is why this legislation is so offensive and ostensibly racist.

  • 17 votes
#1.8 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:07 PM EDT
dirtyharriet1010

As a New Yorker AND a registered Democrat for over 40 years I totally support Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona. If she would run for Governor of my state and do the same thing about ALL the illegals here she will be the first Republican I will fully support.

If you are here legally there should be no problem showing ID.

I'm tired of pressing "1" for English.

  • 18 votes
#1.9 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:46 PM EDT
Greg&Jeff

If you are here legally there should be no problem showing ID.

Perhaps YOU don't mind living in a police state, but some of us do. Are we going to end up like Nazi Germany someday?

  • Keep illegals out in the first place. Despite the cost of any walls or manpower it's still cheaper then trying to round them up and transport them later over and over and over again in an endless cycle.
  • Target the workplaces. No jobs=No money=they won't have a reason to stay and will leave on their own and come back legally later on if they want to live here. Problem solved.
  • 8 votes
#1.10 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:03 PM EDT
IndependentThinker-796986

Well, apparently, this law merely clarifies the fact that "Illegal" immigration is, in fact, "illegal"! Who does not understand that concept?

Of course, all the "illegals" are the ones out demonstrating against the fact that everyone else knows they are "illegal".

I suppose:
Murderers would like to see murder as not illegal.
Rapists would like to see rape as not illegal.
Bank robbers would like to see bank robbing as not illegal.
Criminally assaulting bullys would like to see criminal assault as not illegal.
,,,,,,,,,well, you get the idea.
And, of course, Illegal aliens would like to see illegal immigration as not illegal.

Interestingly enough, when you see all the domonstrators supporting illegal aliens, you know who the illegal aliens are, in one big bunch. Would be fun to go through that crowd and check their illegal alien status.

  • 10 votes
#1.11 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:24 PM EDT
j.r.-1777457

What a great law!! If we could have the same law in Texas, maybe we could turn this deal around. Never mind; no chance. Way to go Arizona!

  • 3 votes
#1.12 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:16 PM EDT
Richard C-458756

R.Donald S,

What is your solution?

  • 1 vote
#1.13 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:30 PM EDT
mrsrachelm

Are we going to end up like Nazi Germany someday?

And yep...there goes the nazi card, rofl.

  • 6 votes
#1.14 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:34 PM EDT
Greg&Jeff

Well mrsrachelm, What do you think the logical conclusion of this would be? Do you think it is impossible to happen?

You'd be wrong.

  • 2 votes
#1.15 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:37 AM EDT
Pissedoffbob

Just reiterating what so many have already said: They are not called displaced immigrants, or welcome immigrants. They are called illegal immigrants because they broke the law sneaking into our country. Maybe this isn't the exact answer, but at least Arizona is doing something about the problem that so many in the past have been content doing nothing about. If someone asks to see my identification I have no problem showing it to them, especially if that's what it takes to curb this problem. The financial burden of illegal aliens in an economic crisis such as this is notable enough to force action on the part of the state government, especially if the federal government is fine with inaction. Winston Churchill, "I never worry about action, but only inaction." Is the small possibility of racial profiling really better with the alternative? I understand the fears and concerns with protecting the inherent rights of the Hispanic Americans. Be it known however, that the reestablishment of illegal immigration as a crime brings with it the attached idea that aiding and harboring a known illegal immigrant is also a crime. I truely hope the enforcement of illegal immigration as a crime drives change in the hurting southwest economy and generally crime-accepting attitudes of the past. Inaction has the possibility of tearing America apart, I believe this state law is at least a step in the right direction.

  • 11 votes
#1.16 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 3:34 AM EDT
Jim420

the hurting southwest economy, is dependant on those illegals spending their "slave" wages here.

as far as Germany,and oppression, as long as the walls we build are to keep people out, and not in. and people continue to do anything to get from their side of the wall to ours. I think we are ok. it's when people stop wanting to come to the United States, that's when I'll be worried

  • 2 votes
#1.17 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:26 AM EDT
renard

Bernie Madoff cost more people more money than every single illegal immigrant in the United States.

The immigrants cost and estimated 10 billion a year

Madoff cost what $50 Billion dollars

  • 2 votes
#1.18 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:55 PM EDT
Azerith

Madoff acted for 20 years. So if you wanna compare with your numbers

$50 Billion-Madoff in 20 years

$200 Billion- Illegal immigrants over 20 years

  • 8 votes
#1.19 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:30 PM EDT
Bill-Weeks

Any interference in Arizona's state law making and law enforcement would be cause for great concern that the Federal Government is encroaching on areas where it doesn't belong, and exceeding the powers given to it by the United States Constitution. As long as Arizona is not sending people back across the boarder, this is a state issue. At the board the Federal Government takes over, not before.

  • 3 votes
#1.20 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:21 PM EDT
renard

Azerith

They really don't know how much Madoff stole or over what period of time.

Point is he stole a lot of money and he was only one white Republican.

And guess what he is not a Mexican or illegal immigrant.

What if there are a million Bernie Madoffs in America?

    #1.21 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:29 PM EDT
    Bill-Weeks

    One of the people that had the most important positive impact on my life was Mexican-American high school teacher. Those that are making this about race or ethnic group on both sides of they issue are terrible wrong in their thinking and discourse.

    • 2 votes
    #1.22 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:34 PM EDT
    Doug-375144

    Illegal means breaking the law , enforce the law.

    • 7 votes
    #1.23 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:39 PM EDT
    Bob-118

    Whether or not Arizona's new law is constitutional it appears to have gotten Washington's attention.

    Availability of plentiful, cheap and compliant labor is another interest of corporate special interests. Illegal immigrant labor? Mox nix.

    • 1 vote
    #1.24 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:11 PM EDT
    mairslm

    It is not much different than an officer asking to see your drivers licence. Yes there will be a few who abuse and those are the ones we will hear about. Go Arizona.

    • 7 votes
    #1.25 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:08 PM EDT
    demitrix

    renard

    Azerith

    They really don't know how much Madoff stole or over what period of time.

    Point is he stole a lot of money and he was only one white Republican.

    And guess what he is not a Mexican or illegal immigrant.

    What if there are a million Bernie Madoffs in America?

    Bernie Madoff was a Democrat btw.

    • 4 votes
    #1.26 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:14 AM EDT
    Azerith

    They really don't know how much Madoff stole or over what period of time.

    Approx. 20 year time period. I was putting your numbers and plugging in my knowledge of the expanse of his crimes

    Point is he stole a lot of money and he was only one white Republican.

    Who cares what race he was? Who cares what his political association is/was? He was a scum bag who ruined lives. He's not a white scum bag. He's not a political scum bag. He's a scum bag.

    And guess what he is not a Mexican or illegal immigrant.

    I don't get why that would matter

    What if there are a million Bernie Madoffs in America?

    What if elephants can crap purple rainbows?

    Does no good to state things like that. No proof and not even close to a valid claim.

    • 4 votes
    #1.27 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:05 AM EDT
    Azerith

    Bernie Madoff was a Democrat btw.

    Lmao. That would be true irony if renard was a democrat

    • 1 vote
    #1.28 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:06 AM EDT
    Dame Quixote

    Perhaps YOU don't mind living in a police state, but some of us do. Are we going to end up like Nazi Germany someday?

    We already live in a police state. Seen what our federal government has been capable of recently? Been to an airport lately? Heard of the Patriot act?

    I support this law. I lived in TX and saw the violence and crime associated with illegal aliens.

    • 8 votes
    #1.29 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:31 AM EDT
    Olyman

    I think all illegals should be held and prosecuted as spies. It's a good enough excuse for any other country that you would mistakenly cross into, it should be good enough for those who intentionally cross our borders illegally as well. Call me a racist, call me what you want. Bottom line is there's no excuse, if you're here illegally, you're a criminal, it's just that easy. You'll notice I didn't say anything about nationality or skin color because it's irrelevant. Don't whine to me or complain about it, facts are facts. If you're not here legally, then good bye.

    • 7 votes
    #1.30 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:04 PM EDT
    renard

    What I find abhorrent about a lot of comments by both male and females here on the Vine is that many of them are always saying about how they honor the service and sacrifices made by the men and women who defend this country.

    Most times in my opinion I believe that they are just mouthing lip service, so that they can wrap their bigotry and racism up in the flag.

    Most Americans in reality never even take the chance of risking their life for anything, not defending their homes or even the lives of their wives and children. And they most certainly do not risk it for our country and the flag.

    But what a lot of them especially here on the vine will do is sit back and talk a good game about freedom, liberty, patriotism and especially taxes.

    I am not saying that illegal immigration, the crossing of our borders is a good thing. And I am sure it creates some problems for local government and law enforcement, but while we are all talking about the problems that it causes we should also be discussing what creates the need for it.

    If more Americans joined the military we wouldn't need immigrant recruits.

    If every American was willing to perform menial unskilled jobs for less pay we wouldn't need immigrant labor.

    If our employers would treat the American workers fairly and the workers would give a fair days work for a fair days pay then we wouldn't need immigrant labor.

    I have seen the face of the enemy of the American Dream, it is the face of the racist and bigots that think that only by discriminating against Americas newest immigrants can they preserve their own chance at the American Dream.

    Competition breeds excellence, not the fixing the rules or rigging the games to predetermine the outcome.

    I think that it is to our national shame that we allow immigrants who are not even citizens of this country to join our military, risk their lives to protect and defend our freedoms and way of life in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Yet when they come home to America they cant work or hold a job in our factories or drive a car unmolested on our streets.

    This reminds me of the plights of African Americans who could fight overseas in Americas foreign wars for American freedoms and values, but who also weren't free to enjoy it or participate in it when they returned home either.

    • 4 votes
    #1.31 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:42 PM EDT
    mrsrachelm

    Like I said before, renaud, if you find living in this country so intolerable to your sensitivities the world is a very big place and there are other truly beautiful countries out there you may like better.

    Personally, I love my country with all it's good and bad. I have seen many an American do the very kind of menial back breaking labor you seem to think they are too lazy to do. I have had family members, friends, and neighbors serve our great country in the Navy, the Air Force, the Marines, the Army and even our local Coast Guard.

    No one is discriminating against "immigrants". Those are the people who are here legally becoming citizens, or who have legal work permits and cross the boarder legally to work here. For some reason you seem to confuse illegal and legal immigration.

    Throw the race card around all you want, renard...add in the nazi card like you did earlier...say whatever you want. The fact that you -can- spout your drivel is because you -do- live in the greatest country in the world. But again, if you find this country and it's people so intolerable, feel free to call another country home where you can be happy.

    Simple, yes?

    • 7 votes
    #1.32 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:06 PM EDT
    Bill-Weeks

    There is way more support for than against Arizona's immigration law. The fact is most American's have had enough.

    • 6 votes
    #1.33 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 5:26 PM EDT
    Peter Faden

    I agree with the law, which is just a reiteration of federal policy anyway...i would however like to see immigration reform as well. Address the cause as well as the problem itself.

    • 2 votes
    #1.34 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:33 PM EDT
    rkymtnwoman

    In politics, right-wing, the political right, or simply the right, are terms which refer, with no particular precision, to the segment of the political spectrum in opposition to left-wing politics. It is usually, but not always, associated with conservatism. (See political spectrum and left-right politics for a detailed explanation and discussion of this kind of classification.)

    The phrase "right-wing" comes from the seating arrangement of parliamentary partisans during the French Revolution. The monarchists who supported the Ancien Régime were commonly referred to as rightists because they sat on the right side of successive legislative assemblies. As this original reference became obsolete, the meaning of the terms has changed as appropriate to the spectrum of ideas and stances being compared, and the point of view of the speaker.

    3 Fascism and right-wing politicsIn the 20th century, outside the United States, where capitalism was always supported by the vast majority of politicians and intellectuals, the most notable distinction between left and right was in economic policy. The right defended capitalism, whereas the left advocated socialism (often democratic socialism) or communism. This distinction has been much less important since the collapse of the Soviet Bloc, as most mainstream left-of centre politicians now accept capitalism to a large degree.

    One strand of right wing thought is concerned with traditional values, the preservation of individual rights, and constraints on government power. In a hard-line form the second and third of these priorities are associated with libertarianism, but many on the right reject most of the assumptions of libertarianism, especially outside of the United States, and some libertarians do not consider themselves to be right wing.

    Another strand of right wing thought, often associated with the original right wing from the times of monarchy, supports the preservation of wealth and power in the hands that have traditionally held them, social stability, and national solidarity and ambition.

    Both of the above strands of right wing thought come in many forms, and individuals who support some of the objectives of one of the above stands will not necessarily support all of the others. At the level of practical political policy, there are endless variations in the means that right wing thinkers advocate to achieve their basic aims, and they sometimes argue with each other as much as with the left.

    The values and policy concerns of the right vary in different countries and eras. Also, individual right wing politicians and thinkers often have idiosyncractic priorities. It is not always possible or helpful to try to work out which of two sets of beliefs or policies is more right-wing (see political spectrum).

    Those on the right are sometimes called "reactionary" by their opponents, a term that first arose to refer to those whose politics was formed in reaction against the French Revolution.

    History of the term

    Since the French Revolution, the political use of the terms "left" and "right" has evolved across linguistic, societal, and national boundaries, sometimes taking on meanings in one time and place that contrast sharply with those in another. For example, as of 2004 the government of the People's Republic of China claims to remain on the "left," despite an evolution that has brought it quite close to what is elsewhere characterized as "right," supporting national cultural traditions, the interests of wealth, privately owned industry, and a rather imperial nationalism. Conversely, the late dictator of Spain, Francisco Franco, who was firmly allied internationally with the right and who brutally suppressed the Spanish left, nonetheless pursued numerous development policies quite similar to those of the Soviet Union and other communist states, which are almost universally considered to be on the "left." Similarly, while "right" originally referred to those who supported the interests of aristocracy, in many countries today (notably the United States) the left-right distinction is not strongly correlated with wealth or ancestry.

    Fascism and right-wing politics

    Despite the important differences from other right-wing ideologies, fascism is almost universally considered to be a part of "the right." This is somewhat parallel to the customary inclusion of Marxism-Leninism (and, in particular, that of the Stalinist Soviet Union and Maoist China) in "the left." Nonetheless, fascism differs significantly from other politics that are usually classified as right wing, and most right-wingers (even many far right groups) reject any association with it, just like most left-wingers (even many communists) reject any association with Stalinism and Maoism.

    Many of the creators of Italian Fascism had originally been supporters of the political left, but eventually turned against their old ideas (for various reasons) and tried to develop a right-wing alternative instead. Philosophers such as Robert Michel, Sergio Panunzio, and Giovanni Gentile were originally syndicalists, a group normally identified with the left and whose tactical propensity for direct action became an element in Italian Fascism. Benito Mussolini himself was originally a socialist, though he had ceased even to claim to be one by the time he was leading the fascist party (and, indeed, many of his old comrades were the first targets of his political police). In the treatise Doctrine of Fascism (written by Gentile but approved by Mussolini); fascism is identified as being of the right and it is declared that the 20th century will be the "century of the right".

    David Schoenbaum argued in his book Hitler's Social Revolution: Class and Status in Nazi Germany, 1933-1939 that Nazism contained certain revolutionary and socialist aspects (although more in rhetoric than in reality), and it was no coincidence that the Nazis often found themselves in a struggle with the Communists for the same constituency (although this can be seen as a typical left/right struggle in elections, albeit involving more radical versions of the two sides, and there is no evidence of voters transferring their support from the KPD to the Nazi party or vice versa, while the Nazis mainly took votes from the DNVP and the DVP). However, it is a historical truth that the DAP, which later became the Nazi Party, was formed in response and in opposition to a brief Communist revolt in Bavaria. While the Nazis opposed individualism and laissez faire capitalism, vigorous opposition to socialism was a founding and continuing tenet of Nazi fascism. Consequently, one of the key motivations behind World War II was Hitler's desire to exterminate communism.

    Japanese fascism, while a distinct phenomenon, is also ordinarily understood as an expression of a right-wing philosophy; but like other forms of fascism, it is only unequivocally right wing if the terms of comparison are limited. Like other forms, it arose in antithesis to the agenda of leftists, Communists, and Socialists.

    In contemporary politics, neofascists and neonazis are said to be far-right. Authoritarian conservatives such as supporters of the former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet or supporters of the military juntas that ruled much of Latin America in the 1970s are also said to be far-right.

      #1.35 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:41 PM EDT
      rkymtnwoman

      Far right, extreme right, hard right, radical right, and ultra-right are terms used to discuss right-wing politics. Far right politics involves supremacism, believing that superiority and inferiority are an innate reality for individuals and groups, and involves the complete rejection of the concept of social equality as a norm.[1] Far right politics supports segregation, and the separation of groups deemed to be superior from groups deemed to be inferior.[2] Far-right politics and political views commonly include authoritarianism, homophobia, nativism, racism, sexism, and xenophobia.[3]

      The terms have been used by different scholars in somewhat conflicting ways.[4]

      The ideologies associated with the far right are fascism, Nazism, racial supremacists (especially neo-fascists and neo-Nazis), religious extremists, and other ultra-nationalist or reactionary ideologies and movements.[5][6][7][8][9] The terms are often used to imply that someone is an extremist.

        #1.36 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:52 PM EDT
        rkymtnwoman

        Fascism will come at the hands of perfectly authentic Americans.
        John T. Flynn

        I'm afraid, based on my own experience, that fascism will come to America in the name of national security.
        Jim Garrison

        we're there!

          #1.37 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 7:15 PM EDT
          Demosthene

          It's not an immigration law. It's a motion stop law enabling the police to arrest anyone who cannot provide proof of citizenship. Anyone. Anyone at all. You, me, my grandmother.

          • 1 vote
          #1.38 - Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:07 AM EDT
          ingenjon

          So... Carry an ID like 99% of the legal citizens do and you wont have a problem.

          • 3 votes
          #1.39 - Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:27 AM EDT
          Elaine-771403

          ILLEGAL MEANS ILLEGAL. What is the REAL controversy here? That America's federal government is unready, unwilling (or exempting from its responsibility) to ENFORCE the LAWS of the UNITED STATES. Due to the federal failure, the federal contempt for American citizens and federal contempt for the RULE OF LAW upon which America is based, the true victim state of Arizona must do whatever it takes to rid itself from foreign invaders and protect the citizens of Arizona from harm, even murder. That is the controversy.

          ILLEGAL MEANS ILLEGAL. The phony victims and leeching criminals who are breaking United States immigration law must be identified without further delay and deported. That's the "fix" that lawbreakers young and old in the sanctuary states of Arizona, Maryland and elsewhere across America need to hear, understand and heed rather quickly. Perhaps high profile Washingtonians can advise of that "fix" in their next outings to elementary schools and other public encounters.

          I support the brave Arizonians who are standing up to the despicable bullying and faux cult of victimhood mentality coming out of broken Washington. We here in Texas have seen firsthand the criminality and violence of LAWBREAKING ALIENS flooding our southern border. And the MANY immigrants I know here who have LAWFULLY followed the RULE OF LAW that America's nominal leaders refuse to respect and enforce, and who have LAWFULLY OBTAINED their legal citizenships by WAITING for YEARS and ENTERING LEGALLY feel EXACTLY as I do. They are INCENSED that these leeches and lawbreakers are giving them a bad name and they also say: NO FREE PASS and NO AMNESTY FOR CRIMINAL aliens now in the US. DEPORT THEM.

          Illegal aliens: Follow Americas laws and gain citizenship lawfully following the laws currently and long on the books. No special deals, rules or entitlements for political expediency of a broke, failed and failing Washington. Otherwise, lawbreakers be gone.

          • 2 votes
          #1.40 - Thu May 20, 2010 6:23 PM EDT
          LegalPrincess

          Right on!!!

            #1.41 - Sun Nov 7, 2010 2:05 PM EST
            Reply
            David Noah

            Arizona asked the Federal Government for Help with a major problem with Kidnapings, violence, Drug cartel warfare, etc.., etc.. and being completly ignored they were forced into a corner and did what they thought was best to try and deal with the problem to protect the Legal citizens of Arizona. Whether you want to admit it or not illigal Imigration is a serious problem for Arizona and the rest of the United States. Its the Responsibility of our government to protect the Citizens of the United States and enforce the Laws and Constitution. If you have a better solution for securing our Southern Border and stopping illigal imigration then why dont you offer it up instead of screeming about Racial Profiling.

            • 18 votes
            Reply#2 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:09 AM EDT
            R. Donald Snyder

            It is the responsibility of the federal government, not the state governments. The fact that Arizona didn't get the response they think they deserved from the federal does not give them the legal right to take immigration law into their own hands. They overstepped their legal boundaries and this law will be slapped down by the federal courts and rightly so.

            • 14 votes
            #2.1 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:44 AM EDT
            WW2Vetran

            You can count on the feds doing something this year! AZ has forced the Feds to do something. Good for AZ!

              #2.2 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:38 AM EDT
              Little Sure Shot

              As the federal government has done little to nothing about this problem, AZ took it into their own hands. As far as it being slapped down, I was listening to the local news yesterday and the report said the Supreme Court backs many points of this legislation. I do agree that this needs to be monitored so that it does not become a witch hunt, but it does need to be done. I totally support this but will remove my support if I see it get out of hand.

              • 12 votes
              #2.3 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:41 AM EDT
              MaryEllen Galloway

              #2.2:I was listening to the local news yesterday and the report said the Supreme Court backs many points of this legislation.

              I do NOT agree with this legislation because it targets the wrong GROUP! It needs to go after the employers who hire the undocumented workers; dry up the demand the the workers will not come.

              Another reason I do NOT agree with this legislation, and believe that it will "not pass the smell test" is because this bill is singling out the "people with brown skins" for pulling over and asked for "papers".

              What about other "undocumented" people (s) - who do not have brown skins? What about the undocumented workers from European countries? Or does the bill only apply to brown skin undocumented workers? IMO, this is another reason it will be stuck down.

              You need to go after the ones (employers) who are hiring the people that will work for a pittance, making the employer even richer and pitting people against people. Go after the employers and this will end the problem guaranteed. They will not come unless they are assured that they will be hired.

              • 9 votes
              #2.4 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:22 PM EDT
              IndependentThinker-796986

              Yes, your current federal government simply does not care to do anything that any of the citizens or states want done. The current administration is basically focused 100% on every way they can to further their socialist nymphomaniacal spending.

              • 5 votes
              #2.5 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:28 PM EDT
              Rixar13

              I don't agree with this law as it's a Federal Issue. If Democrats crafted a Law the GOP would simply say No. Isn't Arizona the State that was building a fence? Perhaps they should build faster..? Smile :-)

              • 7 votes
              #2.6 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:38 PM EDT
              SouthernGentlemanDeleted
              Greg&Jeff

              Oh yeah Rixar....you raise a good point. If it was a bunch of Democrats behind this bill, would the Repubs be singing it's praise? Or would they put it down too just because of who was behind it?

              • 1 vote
              #2.8 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:39 AM EDT
              Azerith

              Probably just who was behind it Greg&Jeff

                #2.9 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:18 AM EDT
                demitrix

                MaryEllen Galloway

                #2.2:I was listening to the local news yesterday and the report said the Supreme Court backs many points of this legislation.

                I do NOT agree with this legislation because it targets the wrong GROUP! It needs to go after the employers who hire the undocumented workers; dry up the demand the the workers will not come.

                Another reason I do NOT agree with this legislation, and believe that it will "not pass the smell test" is because this bill is singling out the "people with brown skins" for pulling over and asked for "papers".

                What about other "undocumented" people (s) - who do not have brown skins? What about the undocumented workers from European countries? Or does the bill only apply to brown skin undocumented workers? IMO, this is another reason it will be stuck down.

                You need to go after the ones (employers) who are hiring the people that will work for a pittance, making the employer even richer and pitting people against people. Go after the employers and this will end the problem guaranteed. They will not come unless they are assured that they will be hired.

                First off, the majority of these "illegals" have "Legal" documentation that usually belongs to someone else. The whole "paying under the table" is not as rampant as everyone believes it to be, even in the construction industry.

                Last week here in Phoenix a local Supermarket Chain did an internal audit, when requesting additional paperwork to ensure compliance they had to fire 300 of their employees. When those people were hired they had proper documentation.

                • 1 vote
                #2.10 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:23 AM EDT
                Azerith

                The whole "paying under the table" is not as rampant as everyone believes it to be, even in the construction industry.

                You are correct. Recently, as the identity thefts sky rocketed, so did the amount of illegals using other peoples ID. There is still quite a bit paying under the table but not as much anymore.

                  #2.11 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:08 AM EDT
                  Reply
                  dogfog

                  Mexican imigration laws are very strick, why shouldn't ours be?

                  • 19 votes
                  Reply#3 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:23 AM EDT
                  R. Donald Snyder

                  Because we don't live in Mexico. We live in the United States of America and we are supposed to be better then that.

                  • 14 votes
                  #3.1 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:45 AM EDT
                  1623 yankee

                  RDS -

                  While I agree COMPLETELY with everything you have stated in your responses, I must point out that this emboldened act of "states' rights" has every chance in the world of literally flying through the American jurisprudence system.

                  If it manages to reach the SCOTUS, we may expect our "packed court" to do the right wing thing NOT the right thing. I do not hold high hopes of any SORT of impartiality or adherence to the "spirit" of the Constitution while this corruption top to bottom exists.

                  The fact is that this is a VERY unique and very considered action on the part of the right wing strategy and you may be sure that it has been mock chorographed from beginning to end with all of the proper switches thrown and routes of least resistance aligned.

                  In the fall, we need to remember that corporate, er excuse me, person dollars will be flowing freely into not just national election cofferes but into every coffer that may have any desired impact on the agendas offered by the gop.

                  It is, without doubt, the most dangerous invasion of domestic enemies this country has ever experienced and I fear for the outcome.

                  As for being better than Mexico, we stand on the brink of being better than none.

                  • 5 votes
                  #3.2 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:41 AM EDT
                  VIVA-796465

                  RDS, we don't live in Mexico...............good for you!!!!!!! So we don't have to obey any laws? Just pick and choose the ones that apply. You are right, we live in a country that does not enforce immigration laws. So keep paying for them..............you like it.

                  • 8 votes
                  #3.3 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:03 AM EDT
                  the noyd

                  Because unemployment is out of hand. We should just let people fleeing Mexico. Take more jobs. The main reason they are leaving Mexico is because their country is F'D up. We need to get this huge problem under control. Things change and we need to stop this problem nation wide.

                  • 6 votes
                  #3.4 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:38 AM EDT
                  IndependentThinker-796986

                  So R.Donald,

                  is it your position that it would be better to be a lawless society than a lawfull society?

                  • 6 votes
                  #3.5 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:30 PM EDT
                  R. Donald Snyder

                  It is my position that Mexican laws are irrelevant to this discussion. Who the @!$%# cares what the laws are in Mexico or China or Russia or any other country? Saying that Mexican laws are tougher then American laws is meaningless. We're discussing American laws.

                  • 10 votes
                  #3.6 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:59 PM EDT
                  independentthinkerDeleted
                  Reply
                  The Spirit

                  I support ANY illegal immigration law that will be enforced. The Feds don't have the guts to do it, so the states are forced to defend themselves.

                  • 22 votes
                  Reply#4 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:58 AM EDT
                  Donny-1160177

                  Why not have every immigrant, or say everyone carry some form of ID with them? I think that would solve the illegal immigration problem and leave little room for profiling. Just my opinion

                  • 1 vote
                  #5 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:20 AM EDT
                  R. Donald Snyder

                  Because the only way you could confirm if a person is in the country illegally is by racial profiling. Unless you want a huge number of federal officers going from person to person to person and demanding to see thier "papers" East Germany during the cold war. I don't know about you, but I'll be god-damned if I'll put up with that kind of treatment.

                  • 15 votes
                  #5.1 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:46 AM EDT
                  lifeisgood43

                  Donny...WTF are you talking about. How are the cop going to know if people have their papers on them without stopping them. Did you read what you wrote.

                  Also why do the business and people get away scott free that hire non-Americans. See non-Americans cannot work if Americans don't hire them. This laws only blames non-Americans. I see a lot of white males in their company trucks picking up non-Americans at my local Home Depot. Not one cop around to harass them

                  • 10 votes
                  #5.2 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:04 AM EDT
                  R. Donald Snyder

                  No officer has the right to demand that any person prove that they are a citizen by demanding that they produce their papers without just cause.

                  • 12 votes
                  #5.3 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:21 AM EDT
                  Wizeguy

                  lifeisgood43 "white males in their company trucks picking up non-Americans at my local Home Depot. Not one cop around to harass them"

                  So now instead of cops staking our bars waiting for drunk drivers they can stake out Home Depot. These "white" males picking up his day workers will now have to pick up "white" males that will work for the same wage...good luck on that happening!

                  • 7 votes
                  #5.4 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:15 AM EDT
                  Azerith

                  Donny:

                  Under Az law you are required to carry a valid ID on you past the age of 18

                  Federal law required any legal immigrant to carry their green card on them at all times for verification purposes

                  The law says plainly that if you do not have one of these then you can be detained till your ID is verified

                  • 11 votes
                  #5.5 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:37 AM EDT
                  BKER1492

                  Put the crack pipe done Snyder. Arizona can mandate ID cards as long as it applies to everyone. As long as they ask the white guy for his ID along with the Hispanic, no violation.

                  • 7 votes
                  #5.6 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:58 AM EDT
                  lifeisgood43

                  BKER.... like that is going to happen. You are the one smoking crack

                  • 8 votes
                  #5.7 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:05 AM EDT
                  Super Ultra

                  Arizona can mandate ID cards as long as it applies to everyone. As long as they ask the white guy for his ID along with the Hispanic, no violation.

                  Yeah but you know that's not going to happen, because this law was crafted to especially apply to the immigrants which are the problem (hispanics) and in most instances you can tell who they are just by looking which will inevitably lead to law enforcement and other agencies using this law to intimidate and harass hispanic people and no they won't always have just cause to ask for the ID unless just cause includes taking a person's race into account. It encourages racial profiling and I don't think it would stand up in a resonable court of law, but we seem to have less of those all the time.

                  • 8 votes
                  #5.8 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:44 AM EDT
                  the noyd

                  Stop the problem where it is the biggest part. In our work force. Don't give away jobs americans need.

                  • 4 votes
                  #5.9 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:40 AM EDT
                  linny-1777056

                  I think racial profiling is, unfortunately, necessary if criminal activity is expected. You don't think they use racial profiling at airports since 9-11? If an officer stops me and asks to see my license or I.D. I give it to him...I have nothing to hide. Now, if you're talking about police brutality and abuse of power....then I totally disagree with that however, we cannot continue to allow this criminal activity to continue at the peril of our legal citizens and action must be taken. The majority of us do not wish to grant amnesty to these criminals either. They simply need to be sent back and come here through the proper channels like other LEGAL immigrants. The laws need to be updated regarding anchor babies as well. We can still be good people without allowing a certain group to trample us.

                  • 7 votes
                  #5.10 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:17 PM EDT
                  Ty-667379

                  Donald it sounds like reading your posts, that you are against the common good of a law that protects the lives of people in the US from drug smugglers, murderers, traffickers, and numerous dangerous scenarios that arise from illegal immigration. This isnt about you or your inalienable rights as a citizen, its about protecting the citizens, families, and children from the dangers that come from the gap in the system that prevents illegal immigration from happening. Why would you have a problem with providing id to anyone that asks for it, you have nothing to hide right? Do you have a DL, SS Card, Democratic lifetime membership card? Do you have a problem with showing those to the DOT, or at the voting booth? Are they profiling you as an illegal because they need to see a DL or SS Card?

                  • 6 votes
                  #5.11 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:42 PM EDT
                  R. Donald Snyder

                  If the reason they ask for that identification is because of the color of my skin, then yes they are profiling me. Can you think of any other way an officer might suspect a person is here illegally then by racial profiling? Guess what, there isn't any. Racial profiling is illegal in this country, because it can only lead to racist behaviour.

                  We need to fix immigration, but a racist law like this is not the answer.

                  • 10 votes
                  #5.12 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:58 PM EDT
                  Woodysr

                  R. D. Snyder, There are towns in Texas, N. Mexico and Arizona, on the border, in which residents might disagree with your general position. I once liked visiting El Paso. Will I visit it now? NO. Not without body armor and my .45 ACP! The Feds have failed. What do you suggest? Come on over, the town welcomes you? Or how about legal work permits and/or immigration. Illegal is Illegal! If I am treated courteously, stop me as often as you like!

                  • 5 votes
                  #5.13 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:16 PM EDT
                  R. Donald Snyder

                  I lived in Arizona for ten years and have lived in Southern California most of the past nine years. I am fully aware of the immigration and crime problems in the border states. Still, that does not give Arizona or any other state permission to ignore the Constitutional protections. It's not their right to stop me and demand my papers just because they have a bug up their ass.

                  • 9 votes
                  #5.14 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:11 PM EDT
                  azdad48

                  5.6 -- the U.S. Border Patrol (Feds) question white people, brown people, yellow people, all people about their citizenship every time we face a mandatory stop on the highway somewhere north of the Mexican border -- which is "always", every time we are on our way home from a trip to Mexico.

                  The Feds have been doing this for years, without being discriminatory about it. Simply tell them you are a citizen, or not, and show them some I.D. or some paperwork that says it's ok for you to be in the U.S. Very simple.

                  Now that Arizona has empowered it's own law enforcement to do exactly as the Feds have done for years, suddenly we're a bunch of racists and people should start boycotting us and we need worthless windbags like Al Sharpton visiting his unwelcome presence upon us.

                  The most absurd thing about all of this is how ignorant so many people are. We want to enforce the federal immigration law, so we made it a state crime too. If this is such a terrible thing, where were all you liberal protestors a month ago? A year ago? Ten years ago?

                  Nothing has changed with this new law except jurisdiction, and Arizona's presumption that we too can enforce immigration law within our own borders. A constitutional question, perhaps, but nothing that fundamentally changes life and interaction with police for whites, blacks, hispanics, asians, native Americans or anyone else in this state. Tomorrow, or 90 days from now to be more precise, it will be exactly as it was last month, last year, last decade.

                  If you are here illegally, you could get busted and deported. If you are a citizen or a legal immigrant, you have nothing to worry about.

                  • 5 votes
                  #5.15 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:04 PM EDT
                  demitrix

                  lifeisgood43

                  Donny...WTF are you talking about. How are the cop going to know if people have their papers on them without stopping them. Did you read what you wrote.

                  Also why do the business and people get away scott free that hire non-Americans. See non-Americans cannot work if Americans don't hire them. This laws only blames non-Americans. I see a lot of white males in their company trucks picking up non-Americans at my local Home Depot. Not one cop around to harass them

                  So let me get this straight. You want businesses to provide the enforcement? The majority of employment are for companoes who think they have hired a "legal" worker that provided false documentation.

                  So rather than have LAW ENFORCEMENT ask to see documentation and check that documentation you think Businesses and HR Departments should be responsible?

                  • 1 vote
                  #5.16 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:28 AM EDT
                  Azerith

                  So rather than have LAW ENFORCEMENT ask to see documentation and check that documentation you think Businesses and HR Departments should be responsible?

                  Only during hiring process imo. As long as a business runs the proper checks as stated by law then the police should be responsible for the rest. As it has been going

                  • 1 vote
                  #5.17 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:11 AM EDT
                  demitrix

                  However, that is not how it has been going here in Arizona. The police were not arresting illegal aliens.

                  Feds though had 0 problems levying fines on businesses who hired in good faith. I am not exonerating alot of the businesses in any way shape or form. Even today we had a business owner and his managers convicted of abusing their illegal employeess, the irony was the owners are hispanic. I am just pointing out that the police (except for Arpaio (not a fan)) did nothing.

                    #5.18 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:58 AM EDT
                    Azerith

                    I am just pointing out that the police (except for Arpaio (not a fan)) did nothing.

                    Legally before this law there wasn't a lot they could do

                    Police in Az have been doing their part that they can it's just it doesn't get the press that Joe does when he does it

                      #5.19 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:03 AM EDT
                      Reply
                      Wizeguy

                      It's the old "who will be next", Poles, Bosnians, Asians? They just tried a similar act in Manansas, VA. It didn't work too well. All the Hispanics left town. Business suffered, apartments and houses went empty. Laborers were gone the lawns went uncut and the restaurants didn't have enough personell to serve their customers.

                      http://ricksanchez.blogs.cnn.com/2010/04/20/something-made-all-the-immigrants-in-town-leave-suddenly-what/?iref=allsearch

                      Arizona businesses will be losing alot of workers. So if your unemployed and think you can make it on minimum wage or less maybe you should head that way. Personally I think they shot themselves in the foot. But we have to wait and see what happens.

                      • 9 votes
                      Reply#6 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:08 AM EDT
                      Azerith

                      Since the E-verify law that requires all employers to run their employees social through the government for verification it has cut down on the hiring of illegals substantially

                      Az unemployment is at 10% or more right now. So if a mass of jobs open up then believe me when I say there won't be a shortage of applicants

                      • 7 votes
                      #6.1 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:40 AM EDT
                      Wizeguy

                      E-verify law that requires all employers to run their employees social through the government

                      E-Verify is not working so well according to FOX 54% are missed. Of course FOX blamed President Obama for this even though it was enacted in 1986.

                      http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9309

                      So if a mass of jobs open up then believe me when I say there won't be a shortage of applicants

                      This will raise the cost of everything Arizonians now enjoy on the cheap. Lawn service, car washes, restaurants etc...just saying

                      • 7 votes
                      #6.2 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:13 AM EDT
                      Azerith

                      E-Verify is not working so well according to FOX 54% are missed. Of course FOX blamed President Obama for this even though it was enacted in 1986.

                      Yes there are a lot of people that are missed. I'm not sure about the percentage. It isn't Obama's fault but the E-verify law wasn't enacted in '86. It was part of the employers sactions law which passed in '06 (I believe. It could of been later.)

                      This will raise the cost of everything Arizonians now enjoy on the cheap. Lawn service, car washes, restaurants etc...just saying

                      I disagree. When the employers sanctions law passed there was weeks of protests. The message was that illegals should not work and march on the capitol to show how they help the economy.

                      During the protests, it was reported that traffic was lighter and there were less accidents. Officially they couldn't acredit this to the protest.

                      We will have to see though. I don't think this will affect Arizona to much. If and that's a big if, the illegals all leave Arizona I doubt Arizona will suffer as much as others think.

                      Again this is just opinion so I guess we will have to see.

                        #6.3 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:28 AM EDT
                        Wizeguy

                        I guess we will have to see

                        How true!

                        • 3 votes
                        #6.4 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:32 AM EDT
                        ambivalent

                        Perhaps these businesses can then hire workers who pay taxes: legals.

                        • 6 votes
                        #6.5 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:02 PM EDT
                        R. Donald Snyder

                        The illegals they hired paid taxes too because they came out of their paychecks. The difference is at the end of the year the couldn't file for any money they have coming back, so the government, state and local, gets to keep that too. They also paid sales tax and fuel tax, etc. The idea that they don't pay taxes is a complete crock.

                        • 10 votes
                        #6.6 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:47 PM EDT
                        mrsrachelm

                        You -do- realize that many of them are hired under the table and paid in cash each day, right? So ummm....no, no crock.

                        • 8 votes
                        #6.7 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:51 PM EDT
                        R. Donald Snyder

                        No, the vast majority of them that I know are not hired under the table, so yes, it's a crock. Besides, even those few that are still pay sales taxes and fuel taxes, etc.

                        • 4 votes
                        #6.8 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:53 PM EDT
                        mrsrachelm

                        We'll have to agree to disagree.

                        • 2 votes
                        #6.9 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:59 PM EDT
                        Greg&Jeff

                        Well, you're wrong here too mrsrachelm. A lot of illegals will use someone else's SS card and an employer a lot of times won't even know that it's not theirs. So they get a paycheck. They get taxes taken out. And they collect no tax refund at the end of the year.

                        • 2 votes
                        #6.10 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:43 AM EDT
                        david-475776

                        R. Donald Snyder - No, the vast majority of them that I know are not hired under the table, so yes, it's a crock. Besides, even those few that are still pay sales taxes and fuel taxes, etc.

                        It is your right not to say anymore. As complicit in Criminal Activty. As it is your US Civic Duty even if you are 19 years old to turn in those Illegally in the US. As indicated by your post: "the vast majority of them that I know are not hired under the table"

                        • 2 votes
                        #6.11 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:53 PM EDT
                        mrsrachelm

                        david-475776

                        R. Donald Snyder - No, the vast majority of them that I know are not hired under the table, so yes, it's a crock. Besides, even those few that are still pay sales taxes and fuel taxes, etc.

                        It is your right not to say anymore. As complicit in Criminal Activty. As it is your US Civic Duty even if you are 19 years old to turn in those Illegally in the US. As indicated by your post: "the vast majority of them that I know are not hired under the table"

                        ROFLMAO!

                        david, LOL. I was just gonna shrug and call it quits. Decided to call him on exactly what you just posted (minus the quote about the law itself) asking how many illegals does he know and has he turned them in yet?

                        Thanks for beating me to it and for looking that up. You're awesome!

                        I'm -still- snickering.....

                        ;-P

                        • 2 votes
                        #6.12 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:15 AM EDT
                        demitrix

                        The falsehood is that illegals help the economy. They do not. They do pay limited Fed Taxes, Medicare, SS etc which they will never utilize.

                        However the true benefits they reap for a better life are paid at the local and state level which they do not contribute to.

                        Medical, Schooling, Food Programs, etc.

                        • 1 vote
                        #6.13 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:31 AM EDT
                        Demosthene

                        I wish that our town would try this. It would open up a lot of business opportunities for the masses of unemployed citizens we have.

                          #6.14 - Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:23 AM EDT
                          Reply
                          Johnbnv

                          Be legal...No worries

                          • 8 votes
                          Reply#7 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:25 AM EDT
                          bigbugy

                          On the contrary,being legal does not guarantee someone freedom from illegal searches according to this new law that was designed for racial profiling.

                          This Law is a direct violation of the constitution,if it's enforced we will see an immediate influx of civil suits filed by victims of discrimination.

                          The lawyers must be salivating in Arizona right now.

                          • 12 votes
                          #7.1 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:40 AM EDT
                          Azerith

                          Bigbugy

                          This law does not violate any search and seizure law. You have to be in violation of a law (assault, jaywalking, trespassing etc) and while being questioned if you don't have a valid ID (required in Arizona if you are 18 or over) then you can be detained till your citizenship is verified.

                          I agree that there probably will be an influx of lawsuits because there always is

                          • 6 votes
                          #7.2 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:43 AM EDT
                          Little Sure Shot

                          "This Law is a direct violation of the constitution." So is being here illegally.

                          • 3 votes
                          #7.3 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:45 AM EDT
                          bigbugy

                          Essentially Arizona legislators have just taken away peoples right to be free from harrasment by the police because they are brown.This is a whole other issue from illegal immigrants.

                          There are illegals here from all over the world so will the police be rounding up whites too and checking their papers?

                          No we know they won't because this law was set in motion as racial profiling for the sole purpose of determining if someone is a citizen or illegal while totally ignoring others of a different race and color who are just as illegal.

                          • 7 votes
                          #7.4 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:06 AM EDT
                          linny-1777056

                          It's worth it to stop this problem which has been spirling out of control for years now. We cannot afford to be politically correct any longer.

                          • 7 votes
                          #7.5 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:25 PM EDT
                          Ty-667379

                          linny great point, im not sure if the situation has anything to do with how most of us think anymore, its all about whether the right wing or left wing promoted it and how illegal it is and start suing everyone. The fact of the matter is, this will make the families of arizona safer and its a great first step to allow california, new mexico, and texas to follow. I am interested in seeing the criminal and murder data from phoenix arizona now compared to 6 months from now.

                          • 4 votes
                          #7.6 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:52 PM EDT
                          Woodysr

                          Yeah, I expect all the illegal Italians, Irish, Polish and Sicilians will be hassled. You know how they are always jumping over the Mexican border!

                          • 3 votes
                          #7.7 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:45 PM EDT
                          R. Donald Snyder

                          The fact is that they won't, no matter what border they crossed and no matter what their status is, because they're not brown like the Hispanics are. Legal Hispanic-Americans on the other hand will be hassled. That is exactly what makes this a racist law and a violation of their civil rights.

                          • 7 votes
                          #7.8 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:50 PM EDT
                          Reply
                          lvh-784809

                          The last time I renewed my drivers license I had to prove I was "legal". Born here, but presented all necessary papers to prove my status. Was I annoyed? Sure , but I did it.

                          This might be inconvenient and uncomfortable for some , but necessary.

                          This is a tad off topic but something I want to mention. I received a call from my congressman's office yesterday. It was in answer to a letter I had written concerning the census and the participation of illegals. It was explained that this is allowed. The process concerns the constitution and an addition made after slavery to allow ex slaves to be counted. So, although illegals, are illegal, they do have a backdoor to the actions taken by this government. The numbers help decide the reps in congress. That is probably why the White House tried to take control of the census process.

                          This is a serious problem and has to be addressed in some way. I wish Obama and the congress would have offered more than "lip service"to this state. Arizona asked for help. Didn't get it.

                          • 6 votes
                          Reply#8 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:22 AM EDT
                          IndependentThinker-796986

                          The only people who do not like laws are outlaws.

                          • 4 votes
                          #8.1 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:34 PM EDT
                          Chuck1968

                          Really? Rosa Parks, MLK, Ghandi, Jesus?

                          • 4 votes
                          #8.2 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:17 AM EDT
                          Reply
                          Free Mason-1490678Deleted
                          Free Mason-1490678Deleted
                          jsautee

                          "Your papers pleeze!" What kind of country are we becoming? Let's reform the laws so that we can enforce our borders and give everyone an equal opportunity to become legal and contributing citizens.

                          • 4 votes
                          Reply#11 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:43 AM EDT
                          Free Mason-1490678Deleted
                          mrsrachelm

                          Let's reform the laws so that we can enforce our borders and give everyone an equal opportunity to become legal and contributing citizens.

                          All well and good but we still have to get rid of all the illegals and their anchor babies that are currently inside our boarders.

                          • 3 votes
                          #11.2 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:31 PM EDT
                          Paul F

                          You know, when someone tries to compare this new law with Nazi Germany, it is horrifically insulting and demeaning to those who actually suffered and were exterminated by the Germans.

                          I am just guessing that a law enforcement officer might investigate a person's citizenship if they A. do not have valid id on them, or B. are involved in criminal activity. I would seriously doubt that in a state that is predominately Hispanic, that they are going to stop someone simply because they "look" a certain way.

                          Although I don't doubt there will be fools screwing with the cops just so that they can video tape them and then sue them for civil rights violations. What a steaming pile of crap the left has become.

                            #11.3 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:30 PM EDT
                            demitrix

                            jsautee

                            "Your papers pleeze!" What kind of country are we becoming? Let's reform the laws so that we can enforce our borders and give everyone an equal opportunity to become legal and contributing citizens.

                            "Your proof of Health insurance Please" says the IRS Agent.

                            Your point?

                            Reform the laws? Do you mean like changing the law that says it is illegal to cross the border at a non-check point? Or do you mean...Let's enforce the LAW.

                              #11.4 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:37 AM EDT
                              Reply
                              ingenjon

                              What a concept! Citizens first! I support Arizona whole heartedly. I hate to break it to you, but we have an illegal alien problem here so we need to verify ctizenship. Why is part of describing people considered racial profiling? If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, its probably a duck... nothing against ducks tho. If a cop approaches a dark skinned, dark haired, brown eyed person who doesnt speak a lick of English, it would be flat out stupid to not ask him to show proof of citizenship. Thats not racial profiling, its called not being blind and deaf. If the police were looking for a short fat bald guy who robbed a liquor store, should all the short fat bald people be upset for being approached? Anti-logic.

                              • 5 votes
                              #12 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:57 AM EDT
                              IndependentThinker-796986

                              The posts supporting the illegal alien protestors are obviously coming from the illegal aliens. Why would anyone else care?

                              Anyone who has a problem proving they are a legal citizen should go to a country where they do not have to prove they are a legal citizen, if they can find one.

                              Adios amigos.

                              • 4 votes
                              #12.1 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:40 PM EDT
                              Greg&Jeff

                              Why would anyone else care? Because some people in this country don't feel like people should have to prove they aren't something over and over again just because they look a certain way. You can be damn sure that they won't be asking 90 year old white grandmas if they are Canadian and came over the boarder illegally. So there is a double standard at work here.

                              • 2 votes
                              #12.2 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:49 AM EDT
                              Chuck1968

                              Adios amigos.

                              oh the irony.

                              • 1 vote
                              #12.3 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:22 AM EDT
                              ingenjon

                              You can be damn sure that they won't be asking 90 year old white grandmas if they are Canadian and came over the boarder illegally.

                              I bet the 90 year old Grandmas wouldn't care if it was doing whats best for the Country and it helped all her unemployed Grandchildren get a job. What the hell is so bad about flashing some I.D. every once in a while. I hate to break it to you folks, but we have a real problem with illegal aliens in this country right now. How else are you gonna find out if theyre legal or not?

                              • 5 votes
                              #12.4 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:35 PM EDT
                              mrsrachelm

                              What people tend to ignore is that many many Americans and legal immigrants of Hispanic background are totally for this law.

                              We have to show ID whenever we use a credit card, whenever we get pulled over for a traffic violation, when we want to open a bank account, apply for a driver's license, go to the hospital ER, and on and on and on. This is not a big deal folks.

                              • 4 votes
                              #12.5 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:16 PM EDT
                              Greg&Jeff

                              Do you have to do it just for walking down the street?

                              • 1 vote
                              #12.6 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:13 PM EDT
                              Greg&Jeff

                              bet the 90 year old Grandmas wouldn't care if it was doing whats best for the Country and it helped all her unemployed Grandchildren get a job.

                              What? You don't think any 90 year olds would be against this law? And you think their grandchildren would want to do the work that people coming over the border do? If so, there's a bridge we'd like to sell to you!

                                #12.7 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:15 PM EDT
                                Paul F

                                G&J - the law does not allow an officer to do what you say. He/she has to have probable cause.

                                You can argue abuse of the law, which I don't doubt there may be from time to time. But a problem with 12-30 million possible illegals in this nation is far more important an issue than to restrict our police from upholding the law, and just maybe cutting into this decades old, multi-billion dollar problem.

                                • 1 vote
                                #12.8 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:47 PM EDT
                                mrsrachelm

                                Do you have to do it just for walking down the street?

                                Whenever I leave my house/premises, my ID goes with me. So to answer your question, yep.

                                And you think their grandchildren would want to do the work that people coming over the border do? If so, there's a bridge we'd like to sell to you!

                                I notice you seem to have a very low opinion of your fellow Americans and their work ethic. I daresay you are parroting what others have said with little to know basis to back it up statistically. You are entitled to your own personal opinion, of course. I think you'd be surprised at just hard working most Americans are if given the chance.

                                • 1 vote
                                #12.9 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:24 AM EDT
                                demitrix

                                So profiling is what happens anytime they show a blurry sketch on the news? or a generic description of a suspect?

                                I just want to make sure the next time I am asked for my ID (which actually happened less than a month ago after a bank robbery in Scottsdale) that I can start screaming about my civil rights being violated.

                                Bah that is too much work, was easier to say "here you go officer."

                                  #12.10 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:41 AM EDT
                                  Azerith

                                  Lmao

                                  Demitrix you live in Scottsdale?

                                  Nice I'm all the way out in Glendale

                                  Bah that is too much work, was easier to say "here you go officer."

                                  Has happened to me a couple times. Not many but when it does I always seem to have the face of a robber or killer.

                                    #12.11 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:19 AM EDT
                                    demitrix

                                    Yup. Scottsdale.

                                    The only reason I am for this is that the crime has become way too rampant all over the metro and it is not getting better in any way shape or form.

                                      #12.12 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:02 AM EDT
                                      Azerith

                                      I'm 100% for it

                                      The way i look at it is if I don't have my ID on me and I commit a crime then the police have a right to inquire about my citizenship

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #12.13 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:05 AM EDT
                                      VIVA-796465

                                      People have to show ID when picking up a package from FEDEX...............or at the bank, at the doctor's office, when purchasing using a credit card, they check an ID with picture to make sure it's your card.................just think how many times a picture ID is required.

                                      • 3 votes
                                      #12.14 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:53 AM EDT
                                      mrsrachelm

                                      VIVA....shhhhh, you're being logical. That'll get you shot in some places, lol.

                                      • 3 votes
                                      #12.15 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:10 PM EDT
                                      VIVA-796465

                                      Lol..............yeah, good old common sense, whatever happened to it??????????

                                        #12.16 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 5:38 PM EDT
                                        Reply
                                        VIVA-796465

                                        If you are a citizen, don't expect Obama to represent your rights............he will just rob you and keep redistributing your money and rights.

                                        • 7 votes
                                        Reply#13 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:06 AM EDT
                                        KFPH

                                        I'm a citizen, and Obama respect my rights.

                                        He has yet to rob me or redistribute my money or my rights

                                        Enough with the wingnuttery

                                        • 9 votes
                                        #13.1 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:44 AM EDT
                                        VIVA-796465

                                        Good for you...................

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #13.2 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:55 AM EDT
                                        garyray-501488

                                        VIVA,

                                        If you are a citizen, don't expect Obama to represent your rights............he will just rob you and keep redistributing your money and rights.

                                        Please stay on topic here. The topic here is simple and obvious. (See the title). This is not the place for broadly bashing Obama. Feel free to post on topic.

                                        ---Peace

                                        • 6 votes
                                        #13.3 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:04 AM EDT
                                        VIVA-796465

                                        I support the immigration laws of the people of this country................

                                        • 6 votes
                                        #13.4 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:08 AM EDT
                                        MaryEllen Galloway

                                        #13.1:I'm a citizen, and Obama respect my rights. He has yet to rob me or redistribute my money or my rights Enough with the wingnuttery

                                        I'm with you K. My President respects my rights and asks for things that I want done. He has not robbed me either. The "wing-nutter" can only still vent and whine and moan, something they are very good at doing!

                                        But they have nothing else- just a bunch of sore losers who never tire of the lies and inuendoes directed at the President in hopes of diluting his power. But it will not work - not this time! Keep on, President Obama.

                                        • 7 votes
                                        #13.5 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:42 PM EDT
                                        VIVA-796465

                                        Yeah, he's doing great.............as the polls show.

                                        • 4 votes
                                        #13.6 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:57 PM EDT
                                        mrsrachelm

                                        Yup...the POTUS is doing soooo great that he's trying to take away a state's rights to protect themselves, their citizens etc from illegal aliens who are posing -real- and present threats via criminal behavior against these same citizens. Yeah......he's sure doing a great job of that, all right.

                                        HE wouldn't have even touched this issue with a ten foot pole if he didn't think that Arizona was setting a "bad" precedent against -his- power and control. Why else would he suddenly chime in against Arizona all the while making the talking points about how we need to address the issue? You know how the POTUS will "address the issue"? He'll grant all those illegals amnesty and citizenship along with all their free loading relatives.

                                        Yeah, Mr Obama......you're doing such a great job.... /sarc/

                                        • 8 votes
                                        #13.7 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:38 PM EDT
                                        VIVA-796465

                                        I second the.........sarc and add some snark with the fact that Obama seems to play favorites with the states...............he didn't help the border states with protection, but he is throwing them under the bus..............of illegals coming in. Thanks zerO

                                        • 6 votes
                                        #13.8 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:43 PM EDT
                                        IndependentThinker-796986

                                        KFPH!,

                                        You are obviously one of the distributees!

                                          #13.9 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:43 PM EDT
                                          KFPH

                                          distributees of what?

                                          What a completely ignorant statement-you don't know me, you don't who I am, or what I do. I've never received anything that I did not work for in my life-but because I'm a liberal, I must be a low-life society-sucker-right?

                                          The only obvious thing here is your name - based on your post above you have never had an independent or intelligent thought in your life

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #13.10 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:37 AM EDT
                                          Reply
                                          KFPH

                                          You are missing the point that RDS and others are trying to make. Noone is saying that illegal immigration is not a problem, or deny that something needs to be done about it.

                                          This law is basically allowing racial profiling, there simply is no way that law enforcement can use just cause without race and the color of peoples skin coming into play here. You want to do something about illegal immigration-you go after the employers. If there were no jobs-there would be no illegal immigration-period. These employers and corporations are getting off scott-free while the immigrants are criminals-the reality is they are both criminals-they are both doing something illegal.

                                          The hypocrisy will never end with the right. You rail against government intrusion- but are A-OK with massive government intrusion-as long as it fits your agenda. You are very fond of using hitler as a talking point-drawing a line of comparison between he and Obama-yet fail to realize that ID cards were one of the first things hitler implemented, and that he used documentation to "round up the jews"

                                          You embrace corporations rights, and fight to protect them, falsely believing that in effect you are embracing capitalism-but what we have in this country right now is not capitalism-we have massive monopolies-these corporations have more rights and say than any single individual in this nation. You would only need to look to them to see where this immigration problem began-do you not realize that many of these "beloved" American corporations and conglomerates actually actively recruit immigrants? That these corps whose attorneys and ceo's sit on federal benches and head national agencies have policies to bus in illegal workers and put them to work-and they get away with it.

                                          Wake up people. You want a "war on immigration" how's that "war on drugs" working out for you?

                                          • 6 votes
                                          #14 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:05 AM EDT
                                          Ex-Pat-1776

                                          You make some good points,KFPH. It's true that the very same people that headed up some of the BigCo are now heading up the departments that is suppose to monitor them at BigGov. But I'll add that the hypocrisy is on both sides of the political isle. Both parties are guilty of ignoring the problem. Both parties run from it for fear of losing the Latino vote.
                                          The problem needs to be stopped at the border.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #14.1 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:24 AM EDT
                                          IndependentThinker-796986

                                          It's not racial profiling, it's criminal profiling. Identifying criminals (illegal aliens), regardless of what their race is.

                                          • 7 votes
                                          #14.2 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:47 PM EDT
                                          Gary Schneider-416437

                                          Not so good on the "War on Drugs"

                                          To many illegals bringing dope across the border with them

                                          GARY

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #14.3 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:02 PM EDT
                                          nateonm

                                          Both parties run from it for fear of losing the Latino vote.

                                          Its not necessarily the latino vote but what about the big corp that employ the illegals?

                                          might not want to upset where all that campaign money comes from

                                          • 5 votes
                                          #14.4 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:02 PM EDT
                                          mrsrachelm

                                          And all you people who scream racial profiling have likely never read the thing but are relying on all the liberal rhetoric to make your opinion for you. If you do read it you'll see that the police cannot just walk up and down demanding papers willy nilly. They have to catch you breaking the law (wherein they can ask for ID, green cards, etc) or have legitimate probable cause just like always. Just -now- they are being given more oomph to do what the Fed's should have been doing all along.

                                          Like the old saying goes....the only people that complain about speeding tickets are those who get caught speeding. Same thing here. If you're in this country legally and you aren't trying to get relatives or friends or drugs in here illegally....then you've nothing to worry or complain about.

                                          • 3 votes
                                          #14.5 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:44 PM EDT
                                          Greg&Jeff

                                          It's not racial profiling, it's criminal profiling. Identifying criminals (illegal aliens), regardless of what their race is.

                                          Riiiiight. As we just mentioned in another post, they won't be asking 90 year old grandmas if they are from Canada illegally. And they won't be asking only people who have committed a crime. You can bet money on that.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #14.6 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:51 AM EDT
                                          Azerith

                                          I assume you are a racist Greg&Jeff

                                          I assume you are uneducated

                                          I assume you are a fear mongering liberal

                                          I assume you are an illegal alien

                                          I assume you are a dangerous terrorist

                                          I assume you are a baby raper

                                          Just because someone assumes something doesn't make it so.

                                          (PS these weren't meant to insult just for example)

                                            #14.7 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:24 AM EDT
                                            mrsrachelm

                                            I assume he's never actually read the law from beginning to end but is relying on liberal talking points to make his mind up for him.

                                            :-)

                                            • 3 votes
                                            #14.8 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:19 PM EDT
                                            Greg&Jeff

                                            And you know what ASSume stands for, right? Unlike you perhaps, we are quite capable of making up our own minds on things on this end, thank you very much.

                                              #14.9 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:18 PM EDT
                                              Paul F

                                              KFPH - I am not buying your version of the truth.

                                              Because the truth is if an employer did what you say, THEY would be attacked by you and the likes of you with exactly the same old tired argument. Profiling is helpful in finding criminals and stopping them.

                                              Every poll that I've seen this weekend show that 70-95% of Americans support this law. I am not a big fan of polls, but this seems a pretty cut and dried example of doing the right thing for the right reasons.

                                              Those that hate are going to hate. Most of us just want our country protected like the vast majority of nations around the globe.

                                              But it is interesting. The left loves to tout the nations who are supposedly more advanced than us with their free, or single-payer healthcare. But when we try to protect our borders and our nation from illegals as these other nations do, you suddenly disagree.

                                              And if you don't think the two topics are directly related, inform yourself. CA is in horrific financial shape, in large part due to our state being overrun with the cost of illegal immigration. Those not saddled with these problems in other states are far more likely to sit on their high horse and pontificate.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #14.10 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:55 PM EDT
                                              renard

                                              I didn't know you could determine illegality by looking at it.

                                              Is it something that is stamped on a persons forehead that enables you to identify it.

                                              I don't know what and illegal alien or immigrant looks like, nor does that stupid governor of Arizona . She admitted on National TV that she doesn't know or even have and idea as to what one looks like.

                                              Can any of you identify dope dealers just by how they look?

                                              Can you identify rapist and child molesters by how the look?

                                              How about serial killers and murderers can they be identified by how they look?

                                              If all of these criminal types can be identified by their appearance, would some one please explain to me why our police can't solve our criminal cases?

                                              Why are there so many unsolved murders and kidnappings in the State of Arizona and the rest of the United States?

                                                #14.11 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:05 PM EDT
                                                Azerith

                                                And you know what ASSume stands for, right? Unlike you perhaps, we are quite capable of making up our own minds on things on this end, thank you very much.

                                                Yes and you have been doing a lot of ASSuming.

                                                You ASSume this law is racist but have no proof

                                                You ASSume cops will racially profile in a state that is widely hispanic

                                                But I can see you have made up your own mind. You care only to see this law as racist because you can't get over your own prejudice and see the facts

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #14.12 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:22 AM EDT
                                                Carol-99

                                                If you do read it you'll see that the police cannot just walk up and down demanding papers willy nilly.

                                                20

                                                B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY

                                                21

                                                OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS

                                                22

                                                STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS

                                                23

                                                UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE,

                                                24

                                                WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON. THE

                                                25

                                                PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
                                                26

                                                PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).

                                                The law says that an officer can demand to see papers for a reasonable suspicion that a person is an illegal alien. That is very vague, and I think that it could lead to officers demanding to see papers willy nilly.

                                                I like the parts of the law regarding transporting an hiring illegals, but aren't there federal laws for that? I don't think that the Arizona law is the answer. The federal government should enforce the current laws.

                                                  #14.13 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 4:22 PM EDT
                                                  mrsrachelm

                                                  The police can also pull you over if they have reasonable suspicion you're driving while intoxicated. OH NOES!!!!! You've been profiled! SUE! /sarc/

                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  #14.14 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 5:25 PM EDT
                                                  Carol-99

                                                  I don't think that being pulled over for suspicion of drunk driving can be compared to being pulled over for having brown skin.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #14.15 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 5:45 PM EDT
                                                  Azerith

                                                  The law says that an officer can demand to see papers for a reasonable suspicion that a person is an illegal alien

                                                  Wrong. It says for any lawful contact (traffic, or other state and federal laws that you are being pulled over for) if you do not produce ID then they can detain you till your citizenship is verified

                                                  Here's an idea, DON'T BREAK ANY LAWS AND YOU SHOULD BE FINE.

                                                  Another idea, if your not perfect and can't do the above CARRY YOUR ID WITH YOU

                                                  • 4 votes
                                                  #14.16 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 8:08 PM EDT
                                                  Azerith

                                                  I don't think that being pulled over for suspicion of drunk driving can be compared to being pulled over for having brown skin.

                                                  If you would of read the law you would of seen the clear language that an officer CANNOT use race for any basis

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  #14.17 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 8:09 PM EDT
                                                  Peter Faden

                                                  It's easier for people to assume and criticize...if they bothered with facts, half these people would have nothing to say. It also seems like people are: confusing law enforcement with immigration reform, which are really two completely separate issues...and taking the opportunity to play the race card and point fingers at the gov't in order to further their own agendas.

                                                  • 4 votes
                                                  #14.18 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 8:13 PM EDT
                                                  Carol-99

                                                  The law is referring to any legal contact with law enforcement, including interviewing a witness of a crime. So, if someone reporting a crime is suspected of being an illegal alien then the officer must verify that they are legal. I do not think that illegals should be discouraged from reporting crimes. I know that they should not be in this country illegally, but their reluctance to report crimes will only encourage criminals. The police chief of Tucson, AZ is concerned that the bill does not define requirements of law enforcement.

                                                  http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126286849

                                                  Mr. ROBERTO VILLASENOR (Police Chief, Tucson, Arizona): It's going to cause some concerns for us. As a local law enforcement chief taking on the responsibility of federal immigration enforcement is something that we really don't have the resources to accomplish. And so that's one of the concerns we have. And also, I think that there's really not enough definition of what the requirements are going to be for local law enforcement in this regard, and there are some definitions that the governor has tasked our Arizona state agency, Arizona post to define what reasonable suspicion will look like in regards to this law.

                                                  Mr. VILLASENOR: Well, I think it says that you can't use race or ethnicity solely as the means of making that determination. I think that there will be an element of that that's looked at. And I think where a lot of people are getting confused is those instances where we stop someone for a criminal violation, we have some reason for that stop and that contact, but I don't believe that's what we're talking about in regard to this law.

                                                  This law is talking about in the course of any legal contact, as well as when we talk to a witness of a crime or when we talk to a victim of a crime. Those are legal contacts of law enforcement. Now we look at it in the context of those legal contacts.

                                                  If in the course of them, we develop reasonable suspicion that the individual we're talking with is illegally in the country, we are mandated to take enforcement action. That's where the questions are coming up is how do you develop that reasonable suspicion that they're in the country illegally if they're there talking to you just about being a victim of a crime.

                                                    #14.19 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:58 AM EDT
                                                    Reply
                                                    Iris-1777426

                                                    I see a lot of scared tactics about how enforcing illegal immigrants to leave is going to have a bad effect on our city or state . What about the effect it had on the city that are overwhelm with illegal immigrants ? If we didn't allow this to happen , we wouldn't have to deal with this mess in the first place . We can't change the past , we can only work on the future .How many of you out there went to look for a job ? Have you notice job description ad will include Spanish speaking is a PLUS! It is terrible that you may have all the qualification/referance for that job .But if you don't speak spanish , I doubt you will be called for a job interview .You better know how to speak Spanish.The last time I check this country language was English ! It is getting out of control .

                                                    • 5 votes
                                                    Reply#15 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:32 PM EDT
                                                    ma91744-1401618

                                                    Looks like Proposition 187, passed by Californians in the early 90"s. My guess is that the law will be challenged, and like 187, the law will be found to be unconstitutional.

                                                    I would not be surprised if the Mexican military were to defend their citizens crossing the border from the racists supposedly protecting ranchers. Like the U.S., Mexico has a right to protect its citizens from acts of terrorist violence.

                                                      Reply#16 - Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:08 PM EDT
                                                      demitrix

                                                      Hrm matter of fact we had a home invasion last week where the criminals wore Mexican Army Uniforms. I think Mexuco has now assumed the border is in North Phoenix now.

                                                        #16.1 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:05 AM EDT
                                                        Reply
                                                        Woodysr

                                                        Oh yeah! Like the Mexican military will stop the drug cartels! The Mexican police will stop illegal activity. The Mexican government will give up "the bite" Fat chance! They are far more corrupt than US legislators.

                                                        If it is contrary to US law....it is illegal. Get your H2 permit or stay out! If you wish to immigrate, do so legally!

                                                        • 4 votes
                                                        Reply#17 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:15 AM EDT
                                                        Rockhead-434586

                                                        According to the poll results, 71% of Viners are racists...or perhaps they understand the severity of the situation and respect the fact that at least one state has the yarbles to do something about it since the feds have drug their collective feet for the past two decades. I'm honestly a little surprised at the results...you'd think, based on the ranting and raving on several of the threads that the results would be the opposite.

                                                        • 5 votes
                                                        Reply#18 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:16 AM EDT
                                                        BIGTIMEj

                                                        I don't understand if illegals are so worthless, why do businesses continue to hire them.

                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        Reply#19 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:52 AM EDT
                                                        Azerith

                                                        Cheap labor

                                                        Usually cash labor so no taxes

                                                        Some will write the payments off as "business expenses"

                                                        They don't have to pay benefits

                                                        They don't have to pay minimum wage etc

                                                        • 3 votes
                                                        #19.1 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:27 AM EDT
                                                        cmach

                                                        NOT cheap labor actually. But true about not having to pay taxes or benefits. And for those of you who are uninformed. They make GOOD wages. NOT minimum wage or lower

                                                          #19.2 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:46 PM EDT
                                                          Azerith

                                                          You usually don't find illegals making more than $12 hr and believe me when I say that, that is damn good for an illegal. If you know of them making more than that, then please by all means show your proof

                                                            #19.3 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:25 AM EDT
                                                            mrsrachelm

                                                            You usually don't find illegals making more than $12 hr and believe me when I say that, that is damn good for an illegal. If you know of them making more than that, then please by all means show your proof

                                                            Oh...and tell us who is paying that starting wage because I know a lot of out of work people in AZ who would love that!

                                                              #19.4 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:22 AM EDT
                                                              Azerith

                                                              Oh...and tell us who is paying that starting wage because I know a lot of out of work people in AZ who would love that!

                                                              Right now? Umm....not a lot

                                                              When construction was still going fast like it was, most were getting paid those wages but they also had stolen someones ID to do it. That and there were quite a few construction companies that just didn't check or didn't care

                                                                #19.5 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:28 AM EDT
                                                                Reply
                                                                Ron Valkenburg

                                                                I just wanted to respond to Mr. Snyder directly.

                                                                Mr. Snyder you have to be the most uneducated and ignorant person I have ever seen posting something to a blog. Yes the individual states CAN pass their own laws for immigration and up hold them without the federal government support and agreement. You my friend need to read our founding declarations for this country and for each state. If you want to get into a legal battle with me regarding this, believe me you will lose because you are not expressing FACTS but liberal opinions. Illegal is Illegal and there are no “Civil Liberties” being violated as they have none being here illegally.

                                                                • 6 votes
                                                                Reply#20 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:04 AM EDT
                                                                mrsrachelm

                                                                And -this- American says "AMEN!"

                                                                • 4 votes
                                                                #20.1 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:21 PM EDT
                                                                cmach

                                                                I am joining msrachelm's amen

                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                #20.2 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:48 PM EDT
                                                                Azerith

                                                                I will join in that

                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                #20.3 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:26 AM EDT
                                                                Reply
                                                                BKER1492

                                                                The Irony of it all.

                                                                You drive a car, you have to have ID.

                                                                You want a drink in a bar, liquor store, or restaurant, you have to have ID.

                                                                You want to go to an R rated movie, you have to have ID.

                                                                You want to rent a car, you have to have ID.

                                                                You want to use the county dump, you have to have ID.

                                                                You want a pack of cigarettes you have to have ID.

                                                                You're breaking into a house or stealing a car or want to vote 16 times for a Democrat. ID not required.

                                                                • 4 votes
                                                                Reply#21 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:09 AM EDT
                                                                bigbugy

                                                                want to vote 16 times for a Democrat. ID not required.

                                                                Then would it be safe to say people can vote for a republican 16 times without showing an i.d. or are the polling stations you refer to Democrat only?Nor do I believe it is required in any state to carry an i.d. when stealing a car or breaking into a home.

                                                                Your comment is immature and rediculous.

                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                #21.1 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:54 AM EDT
                                                                Azerith

                                                                Sense of Humor Bigbugy: Some of us got, some don't. most need it

                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                #21.2 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:58 PM EDT
                                                                mrsrachelm

                                                                BKER, you and so many others have this in perspective. Showing ID is NOT that big a deal. It's nothing new.

                                                                • 4 votes
                                                                #21.3 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:23 PM EDT
                                                                Greg&Jeff

                                                                Having only certain people show it based on the color of their skin is. Well, perhaps we did that with Japanese interment camps too, but we don't really want to go there, do we?

                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                #21.4 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:20 PM EDT
                                                                Paul F

                                                                Here we go with the false argument tactic. No one is throwing anyone into internment camps. If you are here illegally, you need to be arrested and deported.

                                                                This upside down world sponsored by the childish sky-is-falling left has got to stop.

                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                #21.5 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:58 PM EDT
                                                                mrsrachelm

                                                                Japanese internment camps? Now that's a new tactic, lol. I've seen the racial profiling card, the nazi card...and now this. ROFL!

                                                                Drama-lama.

                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                #21.6 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:31 AM EDT
                                                                Reply
                                                                greatjobDeleted
                                                                spirit_entities

                                                                The nation either stands for law and order, or it should fire its law enforcement officials...and, turn the streets over to the gangs!

                                                                If people can illegally enter the country, set-up shop, and squat, here...without legal documentation, to do so...then, why not ditch ALL laws of this nation, and just let things degenerate? Why carry-on the pretense of being a "civilized" country...when the country does nothing to protect its borders against undocumented entrants? Some of these people might carry infectious diseases. Some of these people might be criminals. Some of these people might be...AL-QAEDA! Yet, the White House is "amused" by the "tea parties", and ignores the drug wars, in Phoenix...and, the systematic destruction of the terrirorial integrity of the nation, that he SWORE to protect!

                                                                I have to ask it, again...Who's side is the president pitching for? He's supposedly "in charge", but his definition of "protecting" America, resembles "gone fishing", and couldn't care less...

                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                Reply#23 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:21 AM EDT
                                                                mrsrachelm

                                                                Mr Obama has a huge conflict of interest as far as illegals are concerned because his own Aunt is here illegally. She has been asked twice (I believe) to leave but has refused and Mr Obama sure as heck not encouraging her to do so either. She was even at his inauguration while being here illegally.

                                                                Expecting Mr Obama to act in any way "against" illegals is just not going to happen since a member of his own immediate family -IS- one.

                                                                • 2 votes
                                                                #23.1 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:26 PM EDT
                                                                Azerith

                                                                I agree his interest is conflicted but that's why he's not in the investigation

                                                                  #23.2 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:28 AM EDT
                                                                  Reply
                                                                  live in AZ

                                                                  R. Donald Snyder

                                                                  The illegals they hired paid taxes too because they came out of their paychecks. The difference is at the end of the year the couldn't file for any money they have coming back, so the government, state and local, gets to keep that too. They also paid sales tax and fuel tax, etc. The idea that they don't pay taxes is a complete crock

                                                                  To Mr. Snyder,

                                                                  I will guarantee you what they pay by NO MEANS covers what they milk out of the system through healthcare and our schools. You are sorely misguided.

                                                                  I want you to answer me how my CIVIL RIGHTS are not being violated after having to pay taxes for over 15 years in this country and save up enough to have a baby and end up paying $3000 out of pocket to the hospital and have health insurance and have to pay for EVERY ILLEGAL WOMAN having her baby in that hospital??!!!

                                                                  • 5 votes
                                                                  Reply#24 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:23 AM EDT
                                                                  renard

                                                                  Don't forget road use taxes

                                                                    #24.1 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:20 PM EDT
                                                                    Greg&Jeff

                                                                    I will guarantee you what they pay by NO MEANS covers what they milk out of the system through healthcare and our schools.

                                                                    Schools? Didn't realize there was a mandate for us to educate people here illegally. Healthcare is another matter, but that's more of compassion. You don't really want people dying in the streets do you? Maybe you do.

                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                    #24.2 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:23 PM EDT
                                                                    mrsrachelm

                                                                    Schools? Didn't realize there was a mandate for us to educate people here illegally.

                                                                    Have you been living in a news-free zone for the last several years?

                                                                    The children of illegals are given special classrooms taught by Spanish speaking teachers (because of course they can't speak English nor do their parents want them to learn it). They are given free lunches (which I really don't mind because the poor kids are actually caught in the middle of this thru no real fault of their own).

                                                                    What -should- be happening is that they should still be in their native country in the first place and getting their education there and their food there rather than here.

                                                                    While these massive budget deficits cannot be attributed to any single source, the enormous impact of large-scale illegal immigration cannot be ignored. The total K-12 school expenditure for illegal immigrants costs the states nearly $12 billion annually, and when the children born here to illegal aliens are added, the costs more than double to $28.6 billion.

                                                                    via this link: http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=research_researchf6ad

                                                                    Additionally, to see a full list of the cost of educating illegal immigrants per state back in 2003 go to this link: http://www.couplescompany.com/Features/Politics/schoolbudgets.htm . Needless to say the costs would be MUCH higher now.

                                                                      #24.3 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:41 AM EDT
                                                                      Reply
                                                                      Bighorn

                                                                      The illegal immigrants in Arizona are like fish in an aquarium they feed off of one another and offer zero-zip-nada to the American citizens except economic grief, crime and third world country filth.

                                                                      • 5 votes
                                                                      Reply#25 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:09 PM EDT
                                                                      renard

                                                                      Sort of like the nasty disease and filth that the Europeans gave to the native Americans ,like chicken pox, small pox and typhoid fever and various other deadly diseases that the Europeans gave to the Indians.

                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                      #25.1 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:33 PM EDT
                                                                      mrsrachelm

                                                                      renard, ummm....fail to see the segue there. One is deliberate....the other was not. But whatever.

                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                      #25.2 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:29 PM EDT
                                                                      renard

                                                                      Which are you saying was deliberate, because I remember a US General intentionally using small pox contaminated blankets to infect Indians during the conquest of the old west.

                                                                        #25.3 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:25 PM EDT
                                                                        mrsrachelm

                                                                        You remember it? Really? Just how old -are- you anyway?

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #25.4 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:43 AM EDT
                                                                        VIVA-796465

                                                                        ( : Lol..............have a good Monday!!!!!!!! I'm ready to go out a show my ID to enter the building.

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #25.5 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:56 AM EDT
                                                                        mrsrachelm

                                                                        ;-P

                                                                        LOL, and you too VIVA.

                                                                          #25.6 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:11 PM EDT
                                                                          renard

                                                                          mrsracelm

                                                                          I find it strange how you and others like you make cute silly remarks regarding the serious points other individuals have made simply to avoid the reality and truth of those comments as though some how making a joke out of them reduces the value of the argument.

                                                                          Mexicans today have just as much right to come to America as the people who first came to America from Europe did.

                                                                            #25.7 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:57 PM EDT
                                                                            mrsrachelm

                                                                            I've responded to you seriously several times, renard...then after a while a person just has to laugh. If you want to live your life being totally serious all the time, be all means, have at it.

                                                                            I like to interject some levity now and then. Feel free to put me on ignore if you find my sense of humor personally offensive.

                                                                            See how easy that is?

                                                                            You take care now and have a -happy- day!

                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                            #25.8 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 7:01 PM EDT
                                                                            Reply
                                                                            mrd2u2

                                                                            Mexico would be no longer a 3rd world country if it did not encourage it's people to live elsewhere and if it's corrupt leaders would suggest to the undereducated majority of their population to get educated and work hard to raise Mexico to the status of 1st world. Is there not a 'Mexican Dream'?

                                                                            Money sent back to Mexico from here is Mexico's second greatest source of income after oil revenues. Why would we want to import such a losing non productive group of people by the millions? ( probably 30 million+ and growing by the minute) BTW. We did fine cutting our own grass and raising our babies and working our kitchens. We did it far better so get over that weak unsupported argument. Imprison those that hire illegals at the expense of the countries people. Or worse, send them to Mexico!

                                                                            • 4 votes
                                                                            Reply#26 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 3:42 PM EDT
                                                                            renard

                                                                            I don't know why you are saying that.

                                                                            We are well on our way to being a third world nation and we owe it all to George Bush and the Republican Party.

                                                                            And immigrants from Mexico and South America had nothing to do with it at all.

                                                                              #26.1 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:35 PM EDT
                                                                              Pissedoffbob

                                                                              We are well on our way to being a third world nation and we owe it all to George Bush and the Republican Party

                                                                              You're getting pretty good at scare tactics there buddy, looks like youve been learning something from us Republicans after all. This is reality, not bragging our being big headed: We are a world economic superpower. If at anypoint America did in fact become a third world country, the entire world economy would collapse. Yes, China kind of owns the majority of our debt right now, it still doesn't change our status as one of the top economies in the world. It is just the simple facts, that is why we will not drop to that level. It was very scary though, I applaud your overall creepiness and willingness to scare the inherent patriot attitude in every Republican. I actually pooped a little when I read it.

                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #26.2 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:49 PM EDT
                                                                              Bill-Weeks

                                                                              renard:

                                                                              It may make you feel good to think we're third world nation, but the feeling is fake.

                                                                              The fact is that Mexico continues to be a country engulfed in a drug war, with a weak economy and wide spread poverty. I believe Mexico has all the ingredients to be a developed nation with a broad and strong middle class, and I believe they will succeed. But, the path to success starts with the will of the Mexican people. They have to believe, as most American's do about their country, that they only solution to their childrens future is a strong, vibrant, and safe Mexico.

                                                                              BTW, no Mexico does not have a drug problem. America has a drug problem and we need to start punishing narcotics users severely.

                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #26.3 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:50 PM EDT
                                                                              mrsrachelm


                                                                              We are well on our way to being a third world nation and we owe it all to George Bush and the Republican Party.

                                                                              And immigrants from Mexico and South America had nothing to do with it at all.

                                                                              The illegals crossing our border from Mexico is a non-partisan issue. It's happened for decades and through presidents from both parties, lol.

                                                                              You can point fingers all you want but it won't fix our current problem, will it? We have to deal with this issue as it stands right now. Finally, after waiting for decades for the Feds to do something, the state is stepping up and I for one applaud it.

                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #26.4 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:32 PM EDT
                                                                              renard

                                                                              You guys who think we are still and economic superpower are really not very smart.

                                                                              We are basically financiers and consumers for foreign made products, in this world to be a superpower economically you need to manufacture goods.

                                                                              China is probably the only nation in the world that really manufacturers anything anymore.

                                                                              And as consumers most of us are so far in debt we cant really afford to buy much more than grocery.

                                                                              That is why are economy is still so sluggish after 8 years of Republican tax cutting and almost 8 years of war.

                                                                              As the economies of India and Africa mature we will easily be replaced as consumers of cheap foreign made goods.

                                                                              Ask any crack head or dope addict if it makes a difference which drug dealer sells them their stuff they will tell you know as long as it gets them high.

                                                                                #26.5 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:48 PM EDT
                                                                                mrsrachelm

                                                                                Well you know, renard....

                                                                                if you feel that your life is better served living in another country and that this other country will more adequately supply your needs, you have every right to seek citizenship there. I know for a fact that were I in a country I disliked and there was another I thought would do more for me and my family I'd relocate and seek citizenship (legally, I might add) without a backwards glance.

                                                                                  #26.6 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:48 AM EDT
                                                                                  renard

                                                                                  And so do you!

                                                                                    #26.7 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:14 AM EDT
                                                                                    mrsrachelm

                                                                                    Yeah, I do...but I'm not the one complaining about this country or AZ...you are. So figured I'd let you know you have choices available.

                                                                                    Have a great day.

                                                                                      #26.8 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:13 PM EDT
                                                                                      renard

                                                                                      I like the USA that I and many others like me served to defend and protect not some crazy Republican or Tea Baggers notion or idea of what America is or is not.

                                                                                        #26.9 - Mon Apr 26, 2010 7:01 PM EDT
                                                                                        Reply
                                                                                        Roberto-1778260

                                                                                        Arizona had no choice but to implement its own law to protect the best interests of the state and citizens. You would think after 911 and the security delirium that surrounded it that securing our borders would be a no-brainer.

                                                                                        2/3 of the people in Arizona support the law. Even McCain, an amnesty proponent, flip-flopped because the numbers are against him on this issue in his re-election.

                                                                                        Arizona has a fiscal dilemma it has to address also. I can say unequivocally that living in Los Angeles that the local and state governments are spending much money to accomodate illegals (crime, incarceration, schools, government entitlements, medical). We have hospitals closing here because the emergency rooms are being used as private doctors by the illegals and can't be refused medical care, but the hospitals don't get paid. I work in the medical field so this accurate. Arizona will save money in a host of areas. The bad part is California will only get worse since illegals will redirect their destination here.

                                                                                        • 4 votes
                                                                                        Reply#27 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:43 PM EDT
                                                                                        john92808

                                                                                        This law is the existing federal law on the books. Guess what, they are enforcing it at the state level. This law is "just' and will not be overturned without politicians losing their precious life-time jobs

                                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                                        Reply#28 - Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:40 PM EDT
                                                                                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                                                        Leave a Comment:
                                                                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                                        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                                                        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                                                        Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                                        FUN STUFF:
                                                                                        • Leaderboard |
                                                                                        • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                                                        • Top of the Vine |
                                                                                        • Newsvine Live |
                                                                                        • Newsvine Archives |
                                                                                        • The Greenhouse |
                                                                                        COMPANY STUFF:
                                                                                        • Code of Honor |
                                                                                        • Company Info |
                                                                                        • Contact Us |
                                                                                        • Jobs |
                                                                                        • User Agreement |
                                                                                        • Privacy Policy |
                                                                                        • About our ads
                                                                                        LEGAL STUFF:
                                                                                        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                                        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                                        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com